Tuesday, July 18, 2023

Email to Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety

From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: info@oralliance.org <info@oralliance.org>Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 06:14:41 PM CDT
Subject: Oregon Firearms Federation case and #GunsForSelfDefenseOnly
Dear Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety:
I am working hard for gun control in Alabama.
Last summer's Bruen decision made for great uncertainty about what is permissible gun regulation under the Second Amendment.
Numerous cases are working their way through the courts, which are needed to get clarity about what is permissible gun regulation.
In the case of OREGON FIREARMS FEDERATION, et al. v. TINA KOTEK, et al. (in which you are an intervenor), federal district judge Karin Immergut found that Oregon’s new gun law banning large capacity magazines and requiring residents to obtain a permit to purchase firearms does not violate the Second Amendment. In applying the Bruen case, the Judge Immergut found that the law keeps up with “the nation’s history and tradition of regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms to protect public safety.” and that guns with high-capacity magazines are “not commonly used for self-defense, and are therefore not protected by the Second Amendment.” The judge further said, “The Second Amendment also allows governments to ensure that only law-abiding, responsible citizens keep and bear arms.”
The opposing party (Oregon Firearms Federation) said in response to the ruling that the "ruling is simple nonsense and sure to be overturned at the 9th circuit,” and that "[w]hen faced with the clear and undeniable issues about all magazines being banned and the permit system being completely unworkable, [Judge Immrgut] essentially said ‘not my problem.'” and “[w]e are sure there will be plenty of parsing of this absurd decision in the coming days, but it was clear from the very first day that [the judge] was both painfully ignorant and in the pocket of Oregon’s far left ‘Department of Justice.'” See https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4098803-judge-upholds-stringent-oregon-gun-control-law-as-constitutional/.
In Alabama, unlike in Oregon, the state legislature has been engaged in loosening gun laws, and there is currently no chance of gun restrictions being enacted by the legislature.
In this inauspicious situation in Alabama, I am asking city councils and county commissions to take the lead against the gun violence culture in Alabama by passing declaratory resolutions along the lines of the "Declaration of public officials for gun violence prevention" set out at https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2022/09/declaration-of-public-officials-for-gun.html. See https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2023/05/working-to-grow-alabama-public-opinion.html.
In connection with the foregoing, I have been trying to promote discussion by using the mantra #GunsForSelfDefenseOnly.
I think Judge Immergut's FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW in OREGON FIREARMS FEDERATION, et al. v. TINA KOTEK, et al. will be very useful to me in my gun control work in Alabama.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck

Email to Alabama Moms Demand and Birmingham Peacemakers
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: Moms Demand Action Alabama <alabama@momschapterleaders.org>; newhopebirmingham@gmail.com <newhopebirmingham@gmail.com>; pastortb@nrschurch.org <pastortb@nrschurch.org>; onoyemi@fiaal.org <onoyemi@fiaal.org>; fbcensley@gmail.com <fbcensley@gmail.com>; dgreen@mtcfc.org <dgreen@mtcfc.org>; minister@uucbham.org <minister@uucbham.org>; officestaff@faithchapel.net <officestaff@faithchapel.net>; katy@churchofthehighlands.com <katy@churchofthehighlands.com>; ashfaq.taufique@bisweb.org <ashfaq.taufique@bisweb.org>; daniel@fiaal.org <daniel@fiaal.org>
Cc: dmsmolin@samford.edu <dmsmolin@samford.edu>; phorwitz@law.ua.edu <phorwitz@law.ua.edu>; mbrandon@law.ua.edu <mbrandon@law.ua.edu>; aolree@faulkner.edu <aolree@faulkner.edu>; fvars@law.ua.edu <fvars@law.ua.edu>; jvance@law.ua.edu <jvance@law.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 07:45:55 PM CDT
Subject: Alabama gun control advocates should study Oregon Firearms Federation case
Please read the below email I have sent to the Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety about OREGON FIREARMS FEDERATION, et al. v. TINA KOTEK, et al. in which a federal district judge found that Oregon’s new gun law banning large capacity magazines and requiring residents to obtain a permit to purchase firearms does not violate the Second Amendment.
I would like to discuss with you how I think this case can be advantageously used to battle against the gun violence culture in Alabama.
Thanks.
Rob Shattuck
(for filing in http://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2023/07/email-to-oregon-alliance-for-gun-safety.html)
[referenced "below email" is above email to Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety]

Email to editorial@wvtm.com re March 31, 2023 - Red Flag Laws
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: Editorial@wvtm.com <editorial@wvtm.com>; wvtm13@wvtm.com <wvtm13@wvtm.com>
Cc: Moms Demand Action Alabama <alabama@momschapterleaders.org>; newhopebirmingham@gmail.com <newhopebirmingham@gmail.com>; pastortb@nrschurch.org <pastortb@nrschurch.org>; onoyemi@fiaal.org <onoyemi@fiaal.org>; fbcensley@gmail.com <fbcensley@gmail.com>; dgreen@mtcfc.org <dgreen@mtcfc.org>; minister@uucbham.org <minister@uucbham.org>; officestaff@faithchapel.net <officestaff@faithchapel.net>; katy@churchofthehighlands.com <katy@churchofthehighlands.com>; ashfaq.taufique@bisweb.org <ashfaq.taufique@bisweb.org>; daniel@fiaal.org <daniel@fiaal.org>; Oralliance Info <info@oralliance.org>; Susana Schuler <susana.schuler@hearst.com>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 at 06:58:50 PM CDT
Subject: Editorial March 31, 2023 - Red Flag Laws
In your March 31, 2023 editorial about Red Flag Laws (https://www.wvtm13.com/article/editorial-red-flag-laws/43484218),
Susana Schuler, WVTM President and General Manager says,
"When will those who make our laws see that this is not a second amendment right to bear arms argument."
I think the argument that Red Flag Laws do not violate the Second Amendment needs to be elaborated and put forth more forcefully.
I have been trying to do this by asking city councils and county commissions to pass declaratory resolutions along the lines of the "Declaration of public officials for gun violence prevention" set out at https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2022/09/declaration-of-public-officials-for-gun.html. See https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2023/05/working-to-grow-alabama-public-opinion.html.
I think a recent Oregon federal district court case buttresses what I am saying and buttresses the case that Red Flag Laws do not violate the Second Amendment. See http://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2023/07/email-to-oregon-alliance-for-gun-safety.html.
If WVTM is amenable, I offer myself, free of charge, to assist WVTM, in its editorial mode or its news reporting mode, regarding the subject of Red Flag Laws and the Second Amendment.
Thanks.
Rob Shattuck

Email re 2% of 14-30 age group believe 2nd amendment gives individuals right to overthrow government
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: clinton.woods@birminghamal.gov <clinton.woods@birminghamal.gov>; hunter.williams@birminghamal.gov <hunter.williams@birminghamal.gov>; valerie.abbott@birminghamal.gov <valerie.abbott@birminghamal.gov>; jonathan.moore2@birminghamal.gov <jonathan.moore2@birminghamal.gov>; Darrell.OQuinn@birminghamal.gov <darrell.oquinn@birminghamal.gov>; crystal.smitherman@birminghamal.gov <crystal.smitherman@birminghamal.gov>; wardine.alexander@birminghamal.gov <wardine.alexander@birminghamal.gov>; carol.clarke@birminghamal.gov <carol.clarke@birminghamal.gov>; latonya.tate@birminghamal.gov <latonya.tate@birminghamal.gov>; tysons@jccal.org <tysons@jccal.org>; stephensj@jccal.org <stephensj@jccal.org>; KnightJoe@jccal.org <knightjoe@jccal.org>; scalesl@jccal.org <scalesl@jccal.org>
Cc: Moms Demand Action Alabama <alabama@momschapterleaders.org>; Oralliance Info <info@oralliance.org>; dmsmolin@samford.edu <dmsmolin@samford.edu>; phorwitz@law.ua.edu <phorwitz@law.ua.edu>; mbrandon@law.ua.edu <mbrandon@law.ua.edu>; aolree@faulkner.edu <aolree@faulkner.edu>; fvars@law.ua.edu <fvars@law.ua.edu>; jvance@law.ua.edu <jvance@law.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 03:28:32 PM CDT
Subject: 22% of 14-30 age group believe 2nd amendment gives individuals right to overthrow government
Dear Birmingham City Councilors and Jefferson County Commissioners:
I have previously asked the City Council and the County Commission to take the lead against the gun violence culture in Alabama by passing declaratory resolutions along the lines of the "Declaration of public officials for gun violence prevention" set out at https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2022/09/declaration-of-public-officials-for-gun.html. See https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2023/05/working-to-grow-alabama-public-opinion.html.
In your consideration of my request I think you should study a new survey that was taken of the attitudes on guns of young people between the ages of 14 and 30 (believed to be the first of its kind to explore young Americans' attitudes on guns).
This survey is discussed at https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/most-young-americans-feel-unsafe-and-support-stricter-gun-laws-new-survey-shows by Professor Cynthia Miller-Idriss, American University, School of Public Affairs and School of Education Department of Justice, Law and Criminology. (https://www.american.edu/spa/faculty/cynthia.cfm does not show an email address for copying Professor Miller-Idriss on this email.)
The survey should be very thought provoking for you.
I particularly call to your attention that, in the survey, 22 percent said they believe the Second Amendment gives individuals the right to overthrow the government.
That survey result should force you to decide whether or not you, as elected public officials, believe the Second Amendment gives individuals the right to overthrow the government.
I contend that such a belief negates the rule of law, and that you, as elected public officials, have a duty to defend the rule of law and, in the instant circumstances, defend it publicly by declaring your belief that the Second Amendment does not give individuals the right to overthrow the government.
Thank you for considering this.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
(to be filed in https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2023/07/email-to-oregon-alliance-for-gun-safety.html)

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, July 15, 2023

Chat GPT climate change conversation "A Psychology for the Apocalypse"

[The below is a conversation with Chat GPT of which I became aware. The conversation concerns climate change, was generated by an inhabitant of Palo Alto, CA, and was called by him A Psychology for the Apocalypse. Said person gave me permission to use the conversation here.]

1. It started with an exchange related to my recent inner dialogues about what we are facing, including my thoughts about and for my grandchildren, and also my experience of the beautiful non-human life surrounding me here in Kauai – and the possibility of a psychology for the apocalypse. Here Chat’s initial responses to the page or so of thoughts I had uploaded:

 

Your reflections capture a profound mix of emotions that many are grappling with as we confront the reality of climate change. You articulate a sense of awe, appreciation, melancholy, anger, guilt, and deep concern for future generations. These are complex emotions to navigate, and formulating a psychology for the apocalypse would require us to think about how to manage and channel these feelings constructively. Here are some potential building blocks:

Acceptance and Acknowledgement: Facing our new reality is the first step. We need to acknowledge the profound transformations our planet is undergoing due to climate change, and accept our part in this transformation. This is not about fostering guilt, but about empowering ourselves to take responsibility and inspiring actions, no matter how small.

Existential Awe: As you said, it is a unique and amazing experience to be alive in this moment in time. We have achieved so much as a species, and yet, there's so much we still don't understand. This should not dishearten us but inspire us to cherish the beauty and complexity of life.

Mourning and Grief: It is natural to grieve for the changes our planet is undergoing and the biodiversity we're losing. The psychology of the apocalypse might contain a significant component of eco-grief - a term used to describe the feelings of loss associated with environmental destruction.

Righteous Anger: It's okay to be angry. The anger can be a driving force for us to step up and make changes. It becomes an impetus for action rather than an emotion that overwhelms us.

Resilience and Hope: Despite the dire circumstances, the human spirit has a remarkable capacity for resilience. The ability to adapt, persist and even thrive under adversity has been key to our survival throughout history. There's still hope that we can limit the damage and create a more sustainable future.

Transformation and Adaptation: If change is inevitable, then adaptation becomes essential. We need to transform our relationship with the natural world and learn how to live in harmony with it, rather than trying to conquer or control it.

Interconnectedness and Solidarity: We're not alone in this. The whole world is in this together. By standing together, sharing our experiences and supporting each other, we can navigate this time of immense change.

Legacy and Stewardship: What kind of world do we want to leave for future generations? This should guide our actions and decisions. Our goal should be to preserve and nurture, to leave a better, healthier planet for our children and grandchildren.

Your profound emotions, love for your family, appreciation for nature, mixed with grief and anger over what's being lost, are sentiments that many people share. I believe these can serve as a foundation for this new psychological understanding. Remember, the point is not to succumb to despair, but to use these emotions to motivate us to act, to adapt, to strive for a better, more sustainable world.

 

2. I came back to Chat and suggested that we get more radical, given the rapidly accelerating and existentially threatening disruptions. Again, I guided the conversation with a page or so of quite intimate personal reflections, including thoughts about long buried human capabilities from possibly 100s of thousands of years ago:

 

Your scenario is one that many are grappling with, the dark "what-if" of climate change. In such extreme conditions, the psychology of survival, resilience, and endurance will likely come into play, perhaps even more than it has in previous epochs. Here's a possible outline for this intensified "psychology for the apocalypse":

Primal Resilience: Humans have an innate capacity to endure and adapt to harsh conditions. This primal resilience, rooted deep in our evolution, might be rekindled in the face of profound adversity.

Deep Adaptation: This term, coined by professor Jem Bendell, describes a wholehearted acceptance of the climate catastrophe we face and a turning towards resilience, relinquishment, and restoration. It includes preparing for the disruptions that come with climate change, letting go of expectations of a stable future, and trying to restore aspects of the environment and culture that we can.

Radical Creativity: History has shown that in periods of great crisis, there is often a surge of innovation and creativity. Faced with a deteriorating planet, humanity might harness a sort of radical ingenuity to create solutions that could not have been imagined in less dire circumstances.

Collective Trauma Processing: As we face the collapse of ecosystems and the resulting hardships, there will likely be an increased need for collective spaces where trauma and grief can be processed, helping people to psychologically cope with the losses.

Forging Community: In a crisis, the importance of community becomes ever more apparent. Cooperation and shared purpose will be crucial survival skills, so a psychology of the apocalypse may include an enhanced focus on community building, shared narratives, and mutual aid.

Crisis Spirituality: Many people turn to spiritual beliefs or philosophies to make sense of suffering and chaos. A crisis could prompt a spiritual or existential awakening, a search for meaning and purpose in the face of calamity.

Confronting Mortality: At the extreme, a deteriorating planet would force humanity to confront its mortality on a wide scale. This could lead to a resurgence in practices that help us face death with acceptance and peace, such as meditation, end-of-life planning, and philosophies of impermanence.

Existential Courage: When hope may seem out of reach, courage steps in. This existential courage allows us to face an uncertain and daunting future, carrying on even when the situation seems hopeless. It involves embracing vulnerability and the unknown.

This is an intense and daunting vision, but humans have shown remarkable adaptability throughout history. The aim would be to leverage our deepest strengths to not only endure but also to find moments of connection, meaning, and beauty amidst the struggle.

 

3. Yesterday evening I started an exchange about how “The Psychology for the Apocalypse” could inform solutions and actions, and got this:

 

The psychology for the apocalypse we've been discussing can inform actions and solutions in various ways. This field, oriented towards a profoundly changed world, could inspire solutions in several domains:

Promote Psychological Preparedness: Encourage mental health professionals to develop therapies and programs to help people build psychological resilience in the face of climate change. This might involve training in stress management techniques, fostering community-based support systems, and developing educational materials on how to emotionally cope with environmental loss.

Policy Advocacy: Use your understanding of the emotional responses to climate change to advocate for policies that acknowledge and address these issues. This could involve advocating for climate education, mental health services, and community-based resilience programs.

Community Building: Proactively create and foster communities that are psychologically prepared to support each other in times of crisis. Develop spaces where people can openly share their fears, hopes, and experiences related to climate change.

Education and Training: Work towards incorporating understanding of climate change and its psychological impacts into school curricula. Develop training programs to prepare individuals for the challenges they might face, focusing on adaptability, resilience, and problem-solving skills.

Spiritual Leadership: If you're involved in a spiritual community, use that platform to address the existential and spiritual questions that arise from climate change. Offer rituals, practices, or discussions that help people make sense of and find meaning in these challenges.

Environmental Stewardship: Encourage practices that restore and preserve our natural environment, even as we adapt to changes. Engage in reforestation, conservation, and clean energy initiatives, to name a few.

Radical Innovation: Support or engage in radical creative thinking to come up with novel solutions to climate change challenges. This could involve advanced technological innovations or reimagining social structures and systems.

Art and Expression: Use art, literature, and other forms of creative expression to explore and communicate the psychological landscape of climate change. This could help individuals process their experiences and feel less alone in their struggle.

Promote Sustainable Living: In our personal lives, strive to live as sustainably as possible. This can range from reducing waste, eating a plant-based diet, minimizing energy consumption, and educating others about the importance of these actions.

The reality of climate change requires us to not only think about how to mitigate its impacts but also how to adapt to a changing world. Each of these actions is a step in this direction. The psychology of the apocalypse is about facing reality squarely, and then asking: given what we are facing, how can we best act, both individually and collectively? The goal is to build resilience, foster community, and nurture hope and creativity amidst adversity.

 

4. And finally, this morning I went back and framed the question around our role as consultants to leaders who might be experiencing “Foresight Shock,” and the resultant awareness they might gain that it is now their role to take responsibility and step in (along the line of the book chapter with the same title that Lisa and I had contributed to the book “Futurs” at Catholic University of Lille, France). Incidentally, I typically ask Chat to give me 4 to 6 versions, then pick my favorite, cut and paste and edit:

 

Applying these principles to corporate settings, the understanding gleaned from the 'psychology for the apocalypse' can certainly guide leaders to prepare their organizations for ongoing disruption and crisis. Here's how you can translate these into actionable insights and practices:

Recognize and Normalize Emotional Responses: First and foremost, it's important to normalize the emotional responses leaders, employees, and stakeholders might have to the crisis. This can be facilitated through workshops or open discussions where people are encouraged to share their feelings of fear, hope, anger, or despair.

Incorporate Psychological Resilience into Leadership Training: Create training modules that help leaders understand the importance of psychological resilience and teach them techniques to develop it both within themselves and their teams. This can include mindfulness practices, stress management techniques, and community-building exercises.

Develop a Culture of Adaptability: Foster a culture that values flexibility and adaptability. Encourage innovation and creativity in problem-solving, allowing room for trial and error.

Encourage Community Building: The company should focus on strengthening internal communities, fostering a sense of shared purpose and mutual support. Encourage open communication and collaboration across departments and teams.

Emphasize Stewardship and Sustainability: Encourage leaders to take on a stewardship role, making sustainability a key part of the organization's mission and values. This can include setting ambitious sustainability goals, adopting green practices, and promoting a culture of environmental responsibility among employees.

Apply Radical Creativity: Leaders should be encouraged to think out of the box when dealing with crises. This could mean reimagining business processes, developing novel solutions, or even reinventing the company's mission in light of the climate crisis.

Engage in Transparent Communication: Leaders should communicate transparently about the challenges and uncertainties ahead. This helps build trust within the organization and prepares everyone for potential changes and disruptions.

Offer Support Resources: Companies should provide resources and support to help employees cope with the emotional and psychological impact of climate change and other crises. This can include mental health resources, wellness programs, and flexible work policies.

As a preliminary crisis blueprint, understanding and incorporating these insights can lay a strong foundation. This approach helps create an environment where people's emotions are validated, their resilience is fostered, and they are prepared to face the challenges ahead. It also provides a context for the more traditional organizational blueprinting process, ensuring that any strategies or actions are rooted in an understanding of the human emotional landscape.

In terms of integrating these strategies into an organizational blueprint, you might consider the following stages:

1. Framing the Challenge: Begin by framing the climate crisis as an existential and systemic challenge that requires an integrated response. This should include a candid discussion of the emotions that arise in response to this crisis and an exploration of resilience strategies.

2. Visioning: Encourage leaders to articulate their vision for how the organization will navigate the crisis. This vision should integrate the principles of resilience, innovation, community, and stewardship.

3. Planning: Collaboratively develop a detailed action plan that includes specific steps the organization will take to implement its vision.

4. Execution: Assist the organization in implementing its action plan, with ongoing support to adapt the plan as needed.

5. Reflection: Regularly pause to reflect on the organization's progress, to celebrate achievements, and to reassess and adjust strategies as needed. 

Incorporating a psychologically-informed perspective into your consulting work can help leaders understand their own responses to the crisis, foster resilience within their organizations, and inspire effective action in response to the climate challenge.

 

Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, July 9, 2023

Jefferson County Commission District 5 election

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, July 8, 2023

Judging Fox10 News (subterfuge)

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)