Monday, July 14, 2014

Where is Avery Vise on this?

Avery Vise is the Democratic candidate for Congress in the AL 6th Congressional district. His campaign website is here: http://viseforcongress.com/. I do not know where Avery stands on the issues I am raising. Yesterday I sent Avery this email:

From: Rob Shattuck <rdshattuck@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 5:22 AM
Subject: MAYDAY.US
To: info@viseforcongress.com
Dear Avery,I looked at your website and noted the attention it pays to the "gerrymandered" situation in theBirmingham metropolitan area.
I believe you are adequately aware of the advocacy I made in my 6th district candidacy leading up to the June 3rd election.
I am extending my efforts to a write in campaign for the November election, as I explain here.
I think everyone who wants to advance the MAYDAY.US goals would agree that the more attention that gets paid to the issue anywhere, the better.
I have no idea about your own interest in the MAYDAY.US goals. I hope you want to advance them and you will endeavor to advance them in your campaign.
I would be pleased to discuss the subject with you if you wish to do that at anytime.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck

Friday, July 11, 2014

On Nov. 4, 2014, write in Rob Shattuck for Congress in AL06

The trigger for this entry is last night's MAYDAY.US Q&A session with Lawrence Lessig and Ben Wikler.

The session started at 9 pm Eastern time, and lasted a little over an hour. A podcast of the session can be viewed here. (Note: when I watched it this morning, the audio did not seem to kick in until a minute into the podcast.)

If you are interested in my efforts, you should find an hour to watch the above podcast. The podcast will let you know about the national effort that is being attempted.

This is a national effort, and regardless of the level of interest in the AL 6th Congressional district to try to fix that which is fundamentally wrong with Congress and our governance in Washington DC, there are and will be candidates and people working on this around the country. If you decide it is hopeless in the Alabama 6th Congressional district, you can find ways to contribute to this national effort in other Congressional districts and states.

In this movement, everything potentially helps to advance the cause.

I put in a great deal of effort to publicize this matter in my run from February to June in the Republican primary in the 6th Congressional district. I had no campaign funding, and, by June 3rd, there was only very limited awareness of my candidacy and campaign. I got only 500 to 600 votes.

The test of all this is whether the voters care about the issue. The national effort will depend on this. Right now I would say it is very unknown how much voters care or could come to care about the issue.

For them to care, the voters need to be made aware of the issue, and to find out whether they care, there needs to be a way for voters to register that they care.

Given that everything can potentially help the national effort, and given the soapbox I have constructed about this issue in the Alabama 6th Congressional district, there seems no reason not to extend my efforts to a write in campaign for the November election. Such is an opportunity to do more purveying of my message to the voters, and, to the extent more voters learn about and react favorably to that message, they can register that they care by writing me in on the ballot in November.

If voters in the 6th district don't care about the issue and don't write me in on the ballot in November, that is a fact of life that the national effort will need to take into account.

To the extent voters show that they care about the issue and write me in to demonstrate the same, that will help the national effort.

All in all, it seems a very easy decision for me to extend my efforts to carrying out a write in campaign for the November election, and I am doing so.


Updates

Where is Avery Vise on this?

Why Gary Palmer will be ineffective

BhamBizJournal: "Congressional Inaction Could Derail Recovery"

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Don't despair over DeMarco and Palmer

If you, like me, think something is fundamentally wrong with Congress and our governance in Washington DC, don't despair that DeMarco and Palmer are useless for you.

MAYDAY.US reached its July 4th goal of raising $5,000,000 to fight the corruption of money in politics. Tonight there is a call in of interested citizens from around the country, and they have already left hundreds of comments on this MAYDAY.US webpage.

While DeMarco and Palmer are useless for representing you in the AL 6th Congressional district, take hope from what citizens around the country are thinking about, discussing, and formulating a plan of action about, in order to bring about changes for the benefit of the country and the 6th Congressional district.

Dale Jackson asked me about candidate endorsement

Yesterday Dale Jackson called me to ask whether I was going to endorse DeMarco or Palmer. Here is podcast of Dale's phone interview of me giving my answer:

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

More against Congress and against DeMarco and Palmer

I subscribe to The Wall Street Journal and not to The New York Times, and I am not generally biased in favor of views espoused in the latter paper. It serves my purpose to call to your attention this July 3rd op/ed piece from the Times, in which the current Congress is described as "the most despised Congress in the modern era, if not ever."

What about you?  Do you despise the current Congress?

I do.

In the past five months, I have also called Congress "dysfunctional," "failed," "kaput," "incapacitated" and "sucky."

I also gave a diagnosis for why I think our Congress is kaput.

I tried as hard as I could to get the other six candidates in the Republican primary to address seriously Congress' failed condition, but they refused for four months.

Now we have DeMarco and Palmer as the runoff candidates, and they continue in their silence on this matter.

Only you can decide what kind of candidates DeMarco and Palmer are for you.

This entry follows up on my June 7th entry Analyzing the run off issues #2, in which I discuss that there are those on both the Left and on the Right who think that something is fundamentally wrong with Congress and with the governance of our country in Washington DC.

Yesterday, I received two further emails representing both the Left and the Right. I append those emails below.

On the Right, the first email is from the Alabama state director of the Convention of States Project. The Alabama House of Representatives has been an early actor in the Project, by passing a bill for the calling of a convention.

On the Left, the second email regards Congressman Peter Fazio of Oregon, and his staking out campaign positions regarding The Government By the People Act and constitutional amendments related to the Citizens United case.

DeMarco and Palmer refuse to talk to you about whether there is something fundamentally wrong with Congress and with the governance of our country in Washington DC.

They won't even talk to you about what your own Alabama House of Representatives has passed a bill about.

If you, like me, think there is something fundamentally wrong with Congress and with  the governance of our country in Washington DC, you should agree that DeMarco and Palmer are useless in contributing to the taking of action to try to improve the situation.

Only you can determine what you think about this.  I hope you will take the time to reach a view about this and about how well DeMarco or Palmer would serve you in Congress.


On the Right

From: Convention of States Action Center <no-reply@conventionofstates.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:07 PM
Subject: New Message in Convention of States Action Center
To: rdshattuck@gmail.com



New Message

You have received a new message from Joseph Read at Convention of States Action Center.
All Volunteers,
Article V Convention of States National Petition Drive.  (Alabama is competing against the other states).  Please take a moment to sign the petition--then inform others about Article V and get them to sign up.
Article V Convention of States National Petition Drive. 
Below is 3 minute informational video to share with others

COS Alabama VideoConvention of States - Alabama
J. Bryan Read
Alabama State Director
Convention of Stateswww.ConventionOfStates.com 
To reply to this message, visit action.conventionofstates.com and login.



On the Left
From: Rick Staggenborg <staggenborg4senate@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:39 PM
Subject: DeFazio makes constitutional change a campaign issue
To: Rick Staggenborg <staggenborg4senate@hotmail.com>


Congressman Peter DeFazio has gone beyond cosponsoring amendments to abolish corporate personhood and regulate money in elections. In this email, he makes this a campaign issue.

That makes two congressional candidates in Oregon who have done so at this point, including Aelea Christofferson. I hope others are encouraging candidates in their area to do the same.

Rick


In solidarity for peace and justice,

Rick Staggenborg, MD
Board President, Take Back America for the PeopleFounder, Soldiers For Peace International
http://www.soldiersforpeaceinternational.org/2011/01/asymmetrical-warfare.html

Coos Bay, OR
541-217-8044





From: or04ima@mail.house.gov
To: staggenborg4senate@hotmail.com
CC:
Subject: Fighting Big Money Influence
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 17:12:18 -0400


A Message From Congressman Peter DeFazio 
Click here to open this e-mail in its own browser windowClick here to open a plain text version of this email

            
Dear Friends,
I have spent my entire career fighting for the middle class, small businesses, and those struggling to make ends meet. But, recent Supreme Court rulings like McCutcheon and Citizens United have provided the wealthy with far greater leverage in who our government serves. These court decisions opened the floodgates to unrestricted special interest campaign donations, granting unprecedented power to the wealthiest donors in American elections. I wanted to let you know what I’m doing in Congress to remove the corrosive influence of special interest money in our elections and to help level the playing field so that ordinary Americans like yourself have an equal chance to have your views heard and responded to at election time.
In the four years since Citizens United, we’ve seen a surge in campaign spending from special interest groups. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, total spending from outside groups in the 2012 election cycle tripled 2008′s total and topped $1 billion for the first time ever. The undue influence that free-spending corporations and the wealthy elite now have is putting elected officials in a headlock that’s preventing Congress from passing effective public policy that will improve our economy and benefit all Americans.

The deck is stacked against everyday Americans and it’s time for a new dealer. This is why I am an original cosponsor of H.R. 20, the Government by the People Act, which balances special interest influence by giving ordinary Americans a bigger voice. This bill would empower people who don’t have unlimited funds to spend on campaign contributions by giving them a tax credit for small political donations. Oregon already offers a tax credit for small dollar donations, and Congress would be smart to follow our lead.

I am also a co-sponsor of three separate proposed Constitutional Amendments to overturn the judicial over-reach of Citizens UnitedFirst, H.J. Res 20 would grant Congress the power to regulate contributions and independent expenditures in federal elections. The other two Constitutional Amendments - H.J. Res 21 and H.J. Res 34 – undo the flawed notion that corporations have the same constitutional rights of free speech as people. The perverse concept that corporations are people is an egregious interpretation of our Constitutionally-guaranteed right to freedom of speech and is insulting to our Founding Fathers. 

Even prior to McCutcheon and Citizens United, I have advocated for reform of our broken campaign system. I am a long-time cosponsor of H.R. 1404, The Fair Elections Now Act. This legislation would provide matching public funds to candidates. This would allow candidates to run viable campaigns based on small dollar donations and avoid taking cash from corporate lobbyists and other special interests.
The amount of money spent on elections is corrupting the political system, forcing candidates and office holders to spend more and more time raising money, deterring candidates without personal fortunes from attempting to run, and leaving the impression that campaigns are bought and sold. Unfortunately, we have a few short-sighted Supreme Court Justices who legislate from the bench, passing down a string of misguided rulings that have overturned one hundred years of campaign law.

I’m tired of big money politics.  You can be sure that I will continue to support reforms that will put everyday Americans back in charge of their government.
Sincerely,

Peter DeFazio 

Monday, July 7, 2014

"Most despised Congress in the modern era"

The new york times

The Opinion Pages | CONTRIBUTING OP-ED WRITER

Declaration of Independents

JULY 3, 2014


The election this fall will most certainly return to power the most despised Congress in the modern era, if not ever. The House, already a graveyard for common sense, will fall further under the control of politicians whose idea of legislating is to stage a hearing for Fox News. The Senate, padlocked by filibusters over everyday business, will be more of the same, with one party in nominal control.

The fastest-growing, most open-minded and least-partisan group of voters will have no say. That’s right: The independents, on this Independence Day, have never been more numerous. But they’ve never been more shut out of power.

Earlier this year, Gallup found that 42 percent of Americans identified as independents, the highest it has measured since modern polling techniques started 25 years ago. That survey found that Republicans — destined to keep control of the House and possibly take the Senate — comprise only one in four Americans, their lowest share over that same quarter-century span. Democrats were at 31 percent.

The breakdown is even more unrepresentative when you look at the millennial generation, which, by most definitions, is the largest ever, with about 80 million people. These are the baby boomers’ kids, who bring their life-as-a-buffet view to voting as well. They like choice — in music, food, lifestyle, religion and politics.

Half of all Americans under the age of 34 describe themselves as politically independent, according to a Pew Research Center survey earlier this year, a high-water mark. This generation is also near the highest levels — 29 percent — to say they are not affiliated with any religion.

And if you consider California, our most populous state and long a trendsetter for values and politics, the same picture emerges. There, the latest tally of registered voters shows that the fastest-growing segment is the category of “no party.” While the number of these independent voters in California grew by 50,000 people this year, the Republicans lost almost 37,000. Democrats were basically flat, with a loss of 3,000.

The pattern, nearly everywhere but in the states of the old Confederacy, is the same: People are leaving the Republican Party, and to a lesser extent the Democrats, to jump in the nonpartisan lane. The independents are more likely to want something done about climate change, and immigration reform. They’re not afraid of gay marriage or contraception or sensible gun laws. They think government can be a force for good.

And none of those sentiments are represented by the current majority in the people’s House. The Senate, at least, has two independents, both of whom caucus with the Democrats. In the House? Zero. Remember that the next time Speaker John Boehner says that his members are doing the work of the American people. They’re doing Fox’s work, which is why they’ve had endless hearings on Benghazi, and voted more than 50 times to take away people’s health care, but won’t allow a vote on the minimum wage or immigration reform.

If you thought that the last election — in which 1.2 million more votes were cast for a Democratic member of the House, but the Republicans kept control by a healthy margin — was unrepresentative, the coming contest will set a new standard for mismatch between the voters’ will and the people who represent them.

Only 12 percent of the general public is defined as “steadfast conservative,” in the latest breakdown of seven political niches done by Pew. But that rises to 19 percent for the “politically engaged.” Thus the Tea Party, though disliked by most Americans, can win elections in red states, and send people to Washington who will govern only for the narrow, passionate base that elected them.

When you examine the beliefs of independents, particularly among millennials, they lean Democratic. That is, most policy issues pushed by the Democrats get majority support from the nonpartisans. Combining all the categories, Pew put the pro-Democratic cohort at 55 percent, the pro-Republican at 36 percent. But the two party brands are so soiled now by the current do-nothing Congress and their screaming advocates that voters prefer not to have anything to do with either of them.

The indies still vote. They went for Barack Obama, twice, but hate partisanship. They’ve soured on Obama for not fulfilling his great promise of forging a coalition that is neither red nor blue.

What to do? First, recognize the imbalance. Any democracy is broken when a plurality is not represented in the halls of power. The November contest for control of Congress can’t possibly be a “wave election,” as many politicos will claim, because a near-majority has no slate of candidates.

Second, get a slate of candidates. Some states now allow “no party” politicians a prominent place on the ballot, so long as they finish in the top ranks. In the age of crowdsourcing, raising the kind of money to fight, say, a Koch brothers-backed Republican is not all that difficult.

Third, don’t check out. The emerging majority is the most racially diverse, politically open-minded, social-media-engaged generation in history. They’re repulsed by the partisan hacks, and the lobbyist-industrial complex that controls them. You see their influence in everything but the governing institutions in Washington. It’s about time that voice is heard.

Saturday, July 5, 2014

We the citizens did it on July 4th!!

49,325 citizens, in over just 30 days ended yesterday July 4th, contributed $5,131,689 to fight the corruption of money in politics.  Go to: