Friday, June 24, 2022

SCOTUS Roe stupidity

Email to TV stations
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To:comments@abc3340.com, programming@abc3340.com, Susana.Schuler@hearst.com, blong@hearst.com, wcromwell@cbs42.com, rmartin@cbs42.com, collin.gaston@wbrc.com, jama.killingsworth@waff.com, julie@waff.com, paul.caron@whnt.com, mwright@waaytv.com, sgallien@waaytv.com, eric.duncan@fox10tv.com, Randy.Merrow@fox10tv.com, news@mynbc15.com, dsingleton@mynbc15.com, PAlbrecht@wkrg.com, clombard@wkrg.com, robby.thomas@wtvy.com, stephen.crews@wtvy.com, TCole@wdhn.com, RWare@wdhn.com, mbunting@wsfa.com, sduff@wsfa.com, ghalbrooks@alabamanews.net, jrainey@alabamanews.net, sdiorio@wvua23.com, knorred@wvua23.com
Cc: dmsmolin@samford.edu, tgrove@law.ua.edu, phorwitz@law.ua.edu, mbrandon@law.ua.edu , aolree@faulkner.edu
Sent: Fri, Jun 24, 2022 11:00 am
Subject: Please editorialize about extreme SCOTUS stupidity in its overruling of Roe v. Wade
Dear Alabama TV stations:
Given the 50 years of reliance on Roe v. Wade, I believe the Supreme Court had a sound jurisprudential basis for delaying the effective date of its overturning of Roe v. Wade in order to give people, doctors corporations, states, and other parties time to adjust and react.
I think a delay of 5 to 10 years would be reasonable.
Think about how Brown v. Board of Education, holding segregated schools to be unconstitutional, was implemented under the standard of "all deliberate speed", and that implementation extended over a period of many years, and was not attempted to be done instantaneously.
I think the Supreme Court demonstrated egregious stupidity by not delaying the effective date of its decision overturning Roe v. Wade.
Today, as your TV station reports on the "night of rage" likely to happen tonight, please editorialize about our stupid United States Supreme Court not using sound jurisprudential principles to dampen, and possibly ward off, the raging fury of Americans against one another in the weeks and months to come.
https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2022/06/scotus-roe-stupidity.html

Twitter limited my below reply tweet
6/27/22 Was SCOTUS stupid, indifferent, or malicious?
Was the Supreme Court stupid, or just indifferent, or actually malicious, that, instead of delaying effective date of its decision overturning Roe, and thereby dampening, and possibly warding off, the raging fury of Americans against one another in the weeks and months to come, the Supreme Court acted to fuel said raging fury of Americans against one another?
Possible malice creeps in when you think about the current United States Supreme Court trashing the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court, that it apparently was of no matter to the current Supreme Court that it deemed the Supreme Court institution guilty of a grossly wrong constitutional error upon which Americans for 50 years created a social and cultural environment upon which millions of Americans relied, and then the current Supreme Court acts to correct that institution's own error by instantaneously upending the lives of millions of Americans rather than using it power and authority to ease the monumental transition resulting from the 50 year error on its institutional part that it is now correcting.
The current Supreme Court may trash the previous Supreme Court.
Now the current Supreme Court will endure its own trashing in public opinion for the current Supreme Court's gross dereliction of its responsibility to Americans in how it effectuated correcting its own error.

6/29/22
Email to Alabama Supreme Court Associate Justice Will Sellers
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: _______@alappeals.gov 
Sent: Wed, Jun 29, 2022 6:34 am
Subject: For Justice Sellers: Could SCOTUS have delayed effective date of overturning Roe?
Dear Justice Sellers:
Would you care to comment about whether SCOTUS could have delayed the effective date of its overturning of Roe. v. Wade?
Would you care to comment about whether SCOTUS should have delayed the effective date of its overturning of Roe. v. Wade?
I am trying to discuss this at https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2022/06/scotus-roe-stupidity.html.
Thank you.

Email to University of Notre Dame professors
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To:[email addresses omitted]
Sent: Wed, Jun 29, 2022 6:43 am
Subject: Could and should SCOTUS have delayed effective date of its overturning of Roe v. Wade?
Dear Professors Duffy, Graubar, Bederman, Thomas, Kucich, Marshall, Sander, Hamlin, and Karnes,
In October 2020 I thought then Judge Amy Coney Barrett owed it to the American people to respond publicly to the "Open Letter to Judge Amy Coney Barrett From Your Notre Dame Colleagues" dated October 10, 2020, that you signed and which was published at https://teacher-scholar-activist.org/2020/10/13/an-open-letter-to-judge-amy-coney-barrett-from-your-notre-dame-colleagues/).
I used your open letter in my own plea to Judge Barrett at https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2020/10/plea-to-judge-barrett.html, in connection with which there was below email correspondence.
Now I am trying to push out the question of whether SCOTUS could have and should have delayed the effective date of its overturning of Roe v. Wade. See https://al6thcongdist-ihaveuntiljan13.blogspot.com/2022/06/scotus-roe-stupidity.html.
If you think that is a worthy question to raise publicly at this time, I hope you will use your own means for doing that.
Thank you.
[referenced email correspondence omitted here]
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)